tapebrief

ROST · Q1 2026 Earnings

Bullish

Ross Stores

Reported May 21, 2026

30-second summary

Ross posted a +17% comparable store sales print — its highest ever — with revenue of $6.01B (+21% YoY) and diluted EPS of $2.02, blowing past consensus of $1.72 by 17.4% and the prior Q1 FY2026 guide of $1.60–$1.67 by $0.35. Management raised FY2026 EPS to $7.50–$7.74 (midpoint $7.62 vs prior $7.19), lifted the FY comp guide to +6–7% from +3–4%, and guided Q2 to +6–7% comp on +9–11% sales — framing the quarter not as a one-off but as the output of early-stage transformation initiatives with multi-year runway. The "deteriorating consumer sentiment" thesis that defined Q1 FY2025 is now four quarters dead; Ross is operating as a share-gain story.

Headline numbers

EPS

Q1 FY2026

$2.02

+17.4% vs est.

Revenue

Q1 FY2026

$6.01B

+21.0% YoY

+6.4% vs est.

Gross margin

Q1 FY2026

29.6%

Free cash flow

Q1 FY2026

$0.63B

Operating margin

Q1 FY2026

13.4%

Key financials

Q1 FY2026
MetricQ1 FY2026Q1 FY2025YoYQ4 FY2025QoQ
Revenue$6.01B$5.00B+20.2%$6.63B-9.4%
EPS$2.02$1.47+37.4%$2.00+1.0%
Gross margin29.6%28.2%+140bps27.2%+240bps
Operating margin13.4%12.2%+120bps12.3%+110bps
Free cash flow$0.63B$0.20B+210.4%

Guidance

Guidance is issued for both next quarter and the full year. Both may appear below.

Actuals vs prior guidance

MetricPeriodPrior guideActualΔResult
EPSQ1 FY2026$1.77 to $1.85$2.04+$0.19 to $0.27 above guideBeat
Comparable Store Sales GrowthQ1 FY2026up 3% to 4%17%+13 to 14 pts above guideBeat
Total Sales GrowthQ1 FY20266% to 8%21%+13 to 15 pts above guideBeat
Operating MarginQ1 FY202611.5% to 11.8%13.4%+1.6 to 1.9 pts above guideBeat
RevenueQ1 FY2026$6.01B+$0.36B above consensus estimate of $5.65BBeat

New guidance

MetricPeriodGuideYoY
Comparable Store Sales GrowthFY20266% to 7%
New Store OpeningsFY2026~110 stores (85 Ross, 25 dd's)
EPSQ2 FY2026$1.85 to $1.93
Comparable Store Sales GrowthQ2 FY20266% to 7%
Total Sales GrowthQ2 FY20269% to 11%+63 to 99 bps YoY
Operating MarginQ2 FY202612.

Changes to prior guidance

MetricPeriodPrior guideNew guideΔResult
EPS
FY2026
$6.38 to $6.46$7.50 to $7.74+$1.12 to $1.36 (midpoint +$1.26, or +19.6% higher)Raised

Platform metrics

Q1 FY2026
SegmentQ1 FY2026Q1 FY2025YoY
Comparable Store Sales Growth17%
Total Store Count2,282
Ross Store Locations1,917
dd's DISCOUNTS Store Count365

Management tone

Q1 FY2025 guide withdrawal → Q2 FY2025 reinstatement below LY → Q3 FY2025 branded-strategy re-acceleration → Q4 FY2025 "the best is yet to come" → Q1 FY2026 highest-comp-ever and explicit flywheel articulation.

From cyclical recovery to structural flywheel — five quarters in the making. Four quarters ago Ross pulled its FY guide and named "deteriorating consumer sentiment" as a primary risk. Three quarters ago it reinstated below LY. Two quarters ago management took explicit credit for the branded strategy as the comp driver. Last quarter the language was "the best is yet to come" with confidence about FY2026. This quarter management articulated the model directly: "the flywheel concept of bringing more customers through marketing initiatives, great in-store environment, great merchandise selection, getting them in the store, converting shoppers into buyers...and that just drives more accounts for ourselves." The arc from cyclical defense to a self-reinforcing growth framework is now explicit. Management is no longer asking investors to look through any quarter — they are asking them to recompute the model.

From "early stages" as caveat to "early stages" as runway claim. Two quarters ago the branded strategy was named as a multi-quarter initiative being patiently rolled out; runway was implicit. This quarter the phrase "early stages" appears repeatedly and across three distinct initiative buckets — merchandising, visual merchandising, store labor models, marketing modernization. Per management: "we're in the very, very early stages of many of these initiatives...I think we have plenty of more opportunity for continuing very solid comps." The same language that once signaled patience now signals upside conviction beyond the +6–7% FY guide. Notably, even after raising the FY comp guide by 300bps, management still framed the new range as conservative — at the risk, in their words, of "laying up new second half guidance."

From defensive value-positioning to offensive pricing experimentation. Three quarters ago Ross described good/better/best as a defensive macro hedge — the customer trading down, the value gap protected. This quarter the same architecture is reframed as a growth lever: "we're trying to find if there's even some more opportunities to stretch our prices, not on same goods, but on new brands and new goods." A discipline-first off-price operator publicly entertaining price elevation on new brands is a posture change that has accumulated quietly over multiple quarters.

From conservative inventory and seasonal planning to aggressive chasing. Last quarter pack-away ended at 36% of inventory versus 41% prior year and management described "ample availability." This quarter management acknowledged having to "react to a pretty sharp spike in sales" and that they had to "feed demand" through aggressive merchant chasing. The vendor-relationship change is the operating signature: getting first calls, picking up competitor cancellations, opening new brands. This is what an off-price operator does when its run-rate has reset above its own planning assumptions.

Marketing modernization moved from experiment to operating model. Last quarter Jim opened the door to "slight increase" experimentation in marketing. This quarter marketing modernization is explicitly named as a flywheel input, with new agency creative running and engagement on Meta and TikTok flagged as improving. The CapEx step-up to $1.0B from $819M is partially the financial signature of this shift, though management still maintained discipline on percent-of-sales spend.

Recurring themes management leaned on this quarter:

Customer acquisition acceleration as durable comp driverBroad-based category and geographic strengthEarly-stage transformation initiatives with multi-quarter runwayProduct availability and merchant execution in high-demand environmentMarketing modernization and brand-building momentumInventory health supporting comp growth sustainability

Risks management surfaced:

Tariff refund timing and ultimate amount uncertaintyElevated fuel prices pressuring freight costs in second halfMacro consumer pressure and potential softness in discretionary spendingTougher year-over-year comparisons in second halfMaterial divergence in oil prices from current estimates impacting guidance

Q&A highlights

Simeon Siegel · Guggenheim

What percent of transaction growth comes from new customer acquisition vs. increased frequency? What is the timing of CapEx for 2026? What is the long-term EBIT margin opportunity?

New customers were the primary driver of transaction growth. CapEx estimated at $1 billion vs. $819 million last year, not materially skewed by quarter. Long-term model unchanged: double-digit EPS growth driven by 5% unit growth at 60-70% productivity (3-4% EPS growth), 3-4% comp growth, and 2-3% from share repurchase.

New customers primary driver of transaction growthCapEx: $1 billion in 2026 vs. $819 million in 2025Target: 5% unit growth at 60-70% productivityLong-term EPS growth: 3-4% from comps, 3-4% from gains, 2-3% from share repurchase

Christina Katai · Deutsche Bank

What is driving cosmetics outperformance? Is it branded availability, consumer trade-up, space allocation, or trend? How durable is the performance? How is priority access to deals showing up in buying costs, IMU, speed to floor, and conversion rates?

Cosmetics growth driven by new high-exploding brands, Korean Beauty trend, and improved sales productivity without meaningful space allocation changes. Priority access showing up through vendor calls on opportunistic goods, new vendor openings, and ability to pick up cancellations from mainstream retail and competitors. Market recognizes Ross transformation; merchants have strong relationships and are easy to work with.

Cosmetics space allocation unchanged in any meaningful waySales productivity per square foot improved significantlyKorean Beauty Products identified as key trendNew high-growth brands now in stores

Anisha Sherman · Bernstein

Has there been a cultural shift in how decisions are made driving new initiatives? Can you provide color on customer count growth rates in Q3 and Q4, and whether the run rate has increased?

Cultural shift from defense to offense orientation with emphasis on entrepreneurship, speed in decision-making, and balanced growth orientation vs. historical risk aversion. Customer count growth has been building sequentially, with double-digit growth achieved in both Q3 and Q4, each quarter showing sequential improvement compared to prior periods.

Shift in culture toward more offensive posture while maintaining prudenceEmphasis on entrepreneurship and quick decision-makingDouble-digit customer count growth in both Q3 and Q4Sequential improvement in customer count growth in each of last two quarters

Marnie Shapiro · Retail Tracker

What is the status of store updates and renovations? Are refreshed stores outperforming? Will the buyback continue through the rest of 2026?

Completed refresh of about half the chain with new perimeter signage, wayfinding, and cosmetic repairs. Saw sales improvement and positive customer survey feedback. Paused refresh program to measure impact and evaluate changes for remaining stores and new prototypes before broader rollout. Buyback on track: $1.275 billion total for 2026, unchanged.

Approximately 50% of chain refreshed in 2024Refreshed stores showed sales improvementCustomer surveys showed improved shopping experiencePause on refresh to evaluate additional store changes and prototypes

Dylan Cardin · William Blair

Is new customer growth representing meaningful structural market expansion or just share recapture within existing markets? Is the company expanding up-market and down-market, particularly with younger customers?

Strategy involves concentric circles around core customer bullseye, with deliberate focus on adding new customer segments beyond traditional base. Early results show ability to introduce Ross brand to different pockets of consumers. Acknowledged as very early in evolution but showing positive results in expanding addressable market.

Core customer remains strategic focusConcentric circle strategy to add new customer segmentsEarly success introducing Ross brand to new consumer pocketsFocus on structural market expansion vs. share recapture

Answers to last quarter's watch list

Whether Q1 FY2026 EPS lands above the $1.67 high end. Diluted EPS landed at $2.02, $0.35 above the high end. The FY2026 EPS guide has been raised $0.48 at the midpoint as a direct consequence.
Resolved positively
Traffic versus basket composition of the Q1 comp. Management was emphatic that transactions drove the comp for the third consecutive quarter, with double-digit customer count growth on a comp-store basis sustained across at least the last two quarters and broad-based across all demographics. The "new customer acquisition" thesis is now the explicit operating frame.
Resolved positively
Whether the FY2026 +3–4% comp guide gets raised on the Q1 call. Raised to +6–7%, a 300bps midpoint move. Notably, management still implied this is conservative — "at the risk of laying up new second half guidance, I think we have plenty of more opportunity.".
Resolved positively
Marketing spend trajectory. Marketing modernization is now explicitly named as a flywheel input, with new agency creative running and improved Meta/TikTok engagement. CapEx stepped up to $1.0B from $819M. Discipline retained on percent-of-sales spend, but the posture has clearly moved from "experiment with slight increase" to operating-model investment.
Resolved positively
Home category sustainability. The company didn't break out home as a specific category call-out this quarter; management framed strength as broad-based across categories with cosmetics highlighted as the standout. The absence of a home call-out — positive or negative — in a +17% comp print suggests it is performing in line with the broader strength.
Continue monitoring
Northeast/urban store productivity. Specific NY metro and Puerto Rico productivity data was not disclosed this quarter beyond management's comment that NY-area stores have "far exceeded" underwriting pro forma expectations. The reaffirmed ~110-store FY2026 plan (85 Ross, 25 dd's) at 5% unit growth and 60–70% productivity (per Siegel exchange) is the only quantitative read.
Continue monitoring

What to watch into next quarter

Whether Q2 FY2026 comp prints in the upper half of +6–7% or above — management implied the FY guide leaves headroom. A +8%+ Q2 print would force another FY raise and validate the durability claim; +6% would suggest the +17% Q1 included meaningful non-recurring tax-rebate demand.

Whether Q2 EPS lands above the $1.93 high end — Q1 cleared its guide by $0.35. Even half that beat magnitude in Q2 would push FY EPS visibly above $7.74 and pressure a second raise.

Whether customer count growth remains double-digit on a comp-store basis — this is the structural-vs-cyclical tell. A deceleration to high-single-digit customer count growth would signal the Q1 print drew forward demand; sustained double-digits validates the flywheel.

Quantification of tariff refund impact if/when it lands — management explicitly excluded refunds from forward guidance. Any disclosure of refund timing or size would be incremental upside not currently in the FY guide.

Whether the store refresh program restarts and at what scale — management paused to evaluate prototypes. A Q2 restart announcement with specified store count would signal the refresh is being scaled into the flywheel; continued pause would indicate management still views the program as needing redesign.

Pricing experimentation on new brands — management flagged stretching prices on new brands and new goods as an opportunity. Watch for any explicit AUR commentary or merchandise margin step-up as evidence the experimentation is generating realized mix.

Whether management quantifies any 2026 tariff exposure — this has been the open watch question across multiple prior briefs and remains unaddressed in explicit dollar terms.

Sources

  1. Ross Stores Q1 FY2026 press release (Form 8-K Exhibit 99.1), filed 2026-05-21 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/745732/000074573226000025/q126exhibit991.htm
  2. Ross Stores Q1 FY2026 earnings call commentary (as reflected in extracted Q&A and prepared remarks)

Get the next brief, free.

We publish analyst-grade earnings briefs the same day or morning after every call — headline numbers, segment KPIs, Q&A highlights, and tone analysis. Free during beta.

This is not investment advice.