ROST · Q1 2026 Earnings
BullishRoss Stores
Reported May 21, 2026
30-second summary
Ross posted a +17% comparable store sales print — its highest ever — with revenue of $6.01B (+21% YoY) and diluted EPS of $2.02, blowing past consensus of $1.72 by 17.4% and the prior Q1 FY2026 guide of $1.60–$1.67 by $0.35. Management raised FY2026 EPS to $7.50–$7.74 (midpoint $7.62 vs prior $7.19), lifted the FY comp guide to +6–7% from +3–4%, and guided Q2 to +6–7% comp on +9–11% sales — framing the quarter not as a one-off but as the output of early-stage transformation initiatives with multi-year runway. The "deteriorating consumer sentiment" thesis that defined Q1 FY2025 is now four quarters dead; Ross is operating as a share-gain story.
Headline numbers
EPS
Q1 FY2026
$2.02
+17.4% vs est.
Revenue
Q1 FY2026
$6.01B
+21.0% YoY
+6.4% vs est.
Gross margin
Q1 FY2026
29.6%
Free cash flow
Q1 FY2026
$0.63B
Operating margin
Q1 FY2026
13.4%
Key financials
Q1 FY2026| Metric | Q1 FY2026 | Q1 FY2025 | YoY | Q4 FY2025 | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.01B | $5.00B | +20.2% | $6.63B | -9.4% |
| EPS | $2.02 | $1.47 | +37.4% | $2.00 | +1.0% |
| Gross margin | 29.6% | 28.2% | +140bps | 27.2% | +240bps |
| Operating margin | 13.4% | 12.2% | +120bps | 12.3% | +110bps |
| Free cash flow | $0.63B | $0.20B | +210.4% | — | — |
Guidance
Guidance is issued for both next quarter and the full year. Both may appear below.
Actuals vs prior guidance
| Metric | Period | Prior guide | Actual | Δ | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPS | Q1 FY2026 | $1.77 to $1.85 | $2.04 | +$0.19 to $0.27 above guide | Beat |
| Comparable Store Sales Growth | Q1 FY2026 | up 3% to 4% | 17% | +13 to 14 pts above guide | Beat |
| Total Sales Growth | Q1 FY2026 | 6% to 8% | 21% | +13 to 15 pts above guide | Beat |
| Operating Margin | Q1 FY2026 | 11.5% to 11.8% | 13.4% | +1.6 to 1.9 pts above guide | Beat |
| Revenue | Q1 FY2026 | — | $6.01B | +$0.36B above consensus estimate of $5.65B | Beat |
New guidance
| Metric | Period | Guide | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comparable Store Sales Growth | FY2026 | 6% to 7% | — |
| New Store Openings | FY2026 | ~110 stores (85 Ross, 25 dd's) | — |
| EPS | Q2 FY2026 | $1.85 to $1.93 | — |
| Comparable Store Sales Growth | Q2 FY2026 | 6% to 7% | — |
| Total Sales Growth | Q2 FY2026 | 9% to 11% | +63 to 99 bps YoY |
| Operating Margin | Q2 FY2026 | 12. | — |
Changes to prior guidance
| Metric | Period | Prior guide | New guide | Δ | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPS | FY2026 | $6.38 to $6.46 | $7.50 to $7.74 | +$1.12 to $1.36 (midpoint +$1.26, or +19.6% higher) | Raised |
Platform metrics
Q1 FY2026| Segment | Q1 FY2026 | Q1 FY2025 | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comparable Store Sales Growth | 17% | — | — |
| Total Store Count | 2,282 | — | — |
| Ross Store Locations | 1,917 | — | — |
| dd's DISCOUNTS Store Count | 365 | — | — |
Management tone
Q1 FY2025 guide withdrawal → Q2 FY2025 reinstatement below LY → Q3 FY2025 branded-strategy re-acceleration → Q4 FY2025 "the best is yet to come" → Q1 FY2026 highest-comp-ever and explicit flywheel articulation.
From cyclical recovery to structural flywheel — five quarters in the making. Four quarters ago Ross pulled its FY guide and named "deteriorating consumer sentiment" as a primary risk. Three quarters ago it reinstated below LY. Two quarters ago management took explicit credit for the branded strategy as the comp driver. Last quarter the language was "the best is yet to come" with confidence about FY2026. This quarter management articulated the model directly: "the flywheel concept of bringing more customers through marketing initiatives, great in-store environment, great merchandise selection, getting them in the store, converting shoppers into buyers...and that just drives more accounts for ourselves." The arc from cyclical defense to a self-reinforcing growth framework is now explicit. Management is no longer asking investors to look through any quarter — they are asking them to recompute the model.
From "early stages" as caveat to "early stages" as runway claim. Two quarters ago the branded strategy was named as a multi-quarter initiative being patiently rolled out; runway was implicit. This quarter the phrase "early stages" appears repeatedly and across three distinct initiative buckets — merchandising, visual merchandising, store labor models, marketing modernization. Per management: "we're in the very, very early stages of many of these initiatives...I think we have plenty of more opportunity for continuing very solid comps." The same language that once signaled patience now signals upside conviction beyond the +6–7% FY guide. Notably, even after raising the FY comp guide by 300bps, management still framed the new range as conservative — at the risk, in their words, of "laying up new second half guidance."
From defensive value-positioning to offensive pricing experimentation. Three quarters ago Ross described good/better/best as a defensive macro hedge — the customer trading down, the value gap protected. This quarter the same architecture is reframed as a growth lever: "we're trying to find if there's even some more opportunities to stretch our prices, not on same goods, but on new brands and new goods." A discipline-first off-price operator publicly entertaining price elevation on new brands is a posture change that has accumulated quietly over multiple quarters.
From conservative inventory and seasonal planning to aggressive chasing. Last quarter pack-away ended at 36% of inventory versus 41% prior year and management described "ample availability." This quarter management acknowledged having to "react to a pretty sharp spike in sales" and that they had to "feed demand" through aggressive merchant chasing. The vendor-relationship change is the operating signature: getting first calls, picking up competitor cancellations, opening new brands. This is what an off-price operator does when its run-rate has reset above its own planning assumptions.
Marketing modernization moved from experiment to operating model. Last quarter Jim opened the door to "slight increase" experimentation in marketing. This quarter marketing modernization is explicitly named as a flywheel input, with new agency creative running and engagement on Meta and TikTok flagged as improving. The CapEx step-up to $1.0B from $819M is partially the financial signature of this shift, though management still maintained discipline on percent-of-sales spend.
Recurring themes management leaned on this quarter:
Risks management surfaced:
Q&A highlights
Simeon Siegel · Guggenheim
What percent of transaction growth comes from new customer acquisition vs. increased frequency? What is the timing of CapEx for 2026? What is the long-term EBIT margin opportunity?
New customers were the primary driver of transaction growth. CapEx estimated at $1 billion vs. $819 million last year, not materially skewed by quarter. Long-term model unchanged: double-digit EPS growth driven by 5% unit growth at 60-70% productivity (3-4% EPS growth), 3-4% comp growth, and 2-3% from share repurchase.
Christina Katai · Deutsche Bank
What is driving cosmetics outperformance? Is it branded availability, consumer trade-up, space allocation, or trend? How durable is the performance? How is priority access to deals showing up in buying costs, IMU, speed to floor, and conversion rates?
Cosmetics growth driven by new high-exploding brands, Korean Beauty trend, and improved sales productivity without meaningful space allocation changes. Priority access showing up through vendor calls on opportunistic goods, new vendor openings, and ability to pick up cancellations from mainstream retail and competitors. Market recognizes Ross transformation; merchants have strong relationships and are easy to work with.
Anisha Sherman · Bernstein
Has there been a cultural shift in how decisions are made driving new initiatives? Can you provide color on customer count growth rates in Q3 and Q4, and whether the run rate has increased?
Cultural shift from defense to offense orientation with emphasis on entrepreneurship, speed in decision-making, and balanced growth orientation vs. historical risk aversion. Customer count growth has been building sequentially, with double-digit growth achieved in both Q3 and Q4, each quarter showing sequential improvement compared to prior periods.
Marnie Shapiro · Retail Tracker
What is the status of store updates and renovations? Are refreshed stores outperforming? Will the buyback continue through the rest of 2026?
Completed refresh of about half the chain with new perimeter signage, wayfinding, and cosmetic repairs. Saw sales improvement and positive customer survey feedback. Paused refresh program to measure impact and evaluate changes for remaining stores and new prototypes before broader rollout. Buyback on track: $1.275 billion total for 2026, unchanged.
Dylan Cardin · William Blair
Is new customer growth representing meaningful structural market expansion or just share recapture within existing markets? Is the company expanding up-market and down-market, particularly with younger customers?
Strategy involves concentric circles around core customer bullseye, with deliberate focus on adding new customer segments beyond traditional base. Early results show ability to introduce Ross brand to different pockets of consumers. Acknowledged as very early in evolution but showing positive results in expanding addressable market.
Answers to last quarter's watch list
What to watch into next quarter
Whether Q2 FY2026 comp prints in the upper half of +6–7% or above — management implied the FY guide leaves headroom. A +8%+ Q2 print would force another FY raise and validate the durability claim; +6% would suggest the +17% Q1 included meaningful non-recurring tax-rebate demand.
Whether Q2 EPS lands above the $1.93 high end — Q1 cleared its guide by $0.35. Even half that beat magnitude in Q2 would push FY EPS visibly above $7.74 and pressure a second raise.
Whether customer count growth remains double-digit on a comp-store basis — this is the structural-vs-cyclical tell. A deceleration to high-single-digit customer count growth would signal the Q1 print drew forward demand; sustained double-digits validates the flywheel.
Quantification of tariff refund impact if/when it lands — management explicitly excluded refunds from forward guidance. Any disclosure of refund timing or size would be incremental upside not currently in the FY guide.
Whether the store refresh program restarts and at what scale — management paused to evaluate prototypes. A Q2 restart announcement with specified store count would signal the refresh is being scaled into the flywheel; continued pause would indicate management still views the program as needing redesign.
Pricing experimentation on new brands — management flagged stretching prices on new brands and new goods as an opportunity. Watch for any explicit AUR commentary or merchandise margin step-up as evidence the experimentation is generating realized mix.
Whether management quantifies any 2026 tariff exposure — this has been the open watch question across multiple prior briefs and remains unaddressed in explicit dollar terms.
Sources
- Ross Stores Q1 FY2026 press release (Form 8-K Exhibit 99.1), filed 2026-05-21 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/745732/000074573226000025/q126exhibit991.htm
- Ross Stores Q1 FY2026 earnings call commentary (as reflected in extracted Q&A and prepared remarks)
Get the next brief, free.
We publish analyst-grade earnings briefs the same day or morning after every call — headline numbers, segment KPIs, Q&A highlights, and tone analysis. Free during beta.
This is not investment advice.